The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (“ITAT”) Chennai bench in Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,[1] determined that foreign taxes paid by an assessee, which do not qualify for relief under Sections 90 or 91 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”), cannot be claimed as business expense deduction under Section 37(1).
Continue Reading Foreign taxes cannot be allowed as tax deductible expenditure: Chennai ITAT
The question of whether cross-border services rendered by foreign entities would establish a taxable presence in India has been subject to nuanced scrutiny. In a recent ruling,[1] the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“SC”) has reaffirmed that economic substance (not legal form) is the crucial factor for determining whether a foreign entity exercises substantive control over Indian operations to constitute a permanent establishment (“PE”) in India.
Continue Reading Substance over Form: Supreme Court Clarification on Creation of Permanent Establishment in Cross-Border Services
Businesses are increasingly integrating cloud computing models into their operations, necessitating unambiguity regarding the position of tax leviable on such transactions under the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”), and tax treaties. Uniformity in the tax treatment of cross-border cloud computing models has become crucial for these businesses to plan their operations and tax costs effectively. A long-standing subject of scrutiny has been whether to consider the taxation of payment for cross-border cloud services as “royalties” or “fee for technical services” (“FTS”)/ “fee for included services” (“FIS”). However, in recent rulings, Indian courts have affirmed that such standardised services would not be liable to income tax in India.
Continue Reading Debunking taxation of cloud services as royalty
The Alternate Minimum Tax (“AMT”) has its genesis in the Minimum Alternate Tax (“MAT”), which was introduced to ensure that taxes were paid by even those companies that intended to avoid payment of taxes by engaging in ingenuous tax planning methods despite having earned significant amount of book profits. These companies, called “zero-tax companies”, while reporting significant book profits, paid minimal or no income tax by leveraging various exemptions and deductions available under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”).
Continue Reading AMT: Does It Impose Additional Taxes Under Income Tax Bill, 2025?
The Raunaq Prakash Jain v. Income Tax Officer case addresses a significant cryptocurrency transaction-related taxation issue in India, i.e., whether gains arising from cryptocurrency sales should be taxed as “capital gains” or “income from other sources”. This decision is particularly important because it clarifies the tax treatment of cryptocurrency gains before the introduction of the specific tax regime for virtual digital assets (“VDA”) with effect from April 1, 2022.
Continue Reading Crypto Sales Prior to AY 2022–23: Taxable as Capital Gains?
The Supreme Court (“SC”) recently addressed the validity of reassessment notices in Rajeev Bansal[1], issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”), from April 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021, even though the reassessment regime had been overhauled with effect from April 1, 2021. The Revenue argued that these notices fell under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (“TOLA”), which relaxed the time limits for reassessment due to the COVID-19 pandemic (“Pandemic”). However, several High Courts, including the Allahabad and Gujarat High Courts,[2] had ruled that such notices were subject to the new reassessment provisions introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, and hence, without the applicability of TOLA, were time-barred. The SC, in this landmark decision, ruled in favour of the Revenue, by upholding the validity of TOLA and laid down several jurisprudential observations in its judgement.
Continue Reading Tax reassessment proceedings: Supreme Court puts TOLA controversy to rest
The India–Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (“DTAA”), entered into in 1983, has since been the subject matter of contentious litigations. The well-drafted and reasoned ruling of the Delhi High Court (“Delhi HC”), which explains the availability of benefits to a Mauritius-based investor, the significance of the tax residency certificate (“TRC”), the limitation of benefits (“LoB”) clause, and the grandfathering provision in the treaty, has provided much-anticipated relief and certainty to the taxpayers.
Continue Reading Delhi High Court grants tax-treaty benefits to Tiger Global’s Flipkart exit
With numerous legislative reforms, the government has demonstrated a sincere commitment towards achieving Viksit Bharat, or ‘Developed India’ by 2047. While presenting the Union Budget for financial year 2024-25, on July 23, 2024, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman introduced significant changes to enhance ease of doing business in the International Financial Services Centre (“IFSC”), Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (“GIFT City”). This Budget promises a supportive environment for growth and development, thus giving a fillip to aspiring entities, desiring to have a presence in GIFT IFSC.
Continue Reading Union Budget boost to GIFT IFSC: Looking at a golden future
The Indian government has been introducing pivotal reforms in the Budget to bolster the economy and increase the attractiveness and competitiveness of the International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) globally. These reforms will help foster a robust financial ecosystem, capable of supporting the nation’s ambitious economic goals of becoming a developed country. The 2024 Budget is a curious wait for foreign organisations looking to enter India as well as the IFSC. The aim is to enhance the organisational reach of such foreign companies not only in India, but across the world.
Continue Reading Budget 2024: Expectations and way ahead
The provisions of General Anti-Avoidance Rules (“GAAR”) were implemented into Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”), for the first time with effect from the financial year 2017–18. The GAAR provisions provide the Indian Revenue Authorities (“IRA”) with wide powers, including even recharacterising a transaction, ignoring a part or the whole of a series of transactions, disallowing expenses incurred, etc., if the main purpose of the transaction was to obtain tax benefits. Considering the aggressive nature in which the IRA generally scrutinises the GAAR cases, the industry is always apprehensive that these GAAR provisions could be invoked in a wide-spread manner. However, much to the relief of the taxpayers, the IRA have rarely invoked these provisions.
Continue Reading First judgment on GAAR holds bonus-stripping to be an impermissible tax-avoidance arrangement